<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (8) TMI 615 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126816</link>
    <description>A prior Supreme Court decision had already concluded the point in issue against the appellant, so the Court applied binding precedent and dismissed the appeal without examining the merits. The operative legal principle was that where the controlling question has been settled by an earlier judgment of the same Court, the later appeal cannot be maintained on that issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2015 11:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=163703" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (8) TMI 615 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126816</link>
      <description>A prior Supreme Court decision had already concluded the point in issue against the appellant, so the Court applied binding precedent and dismissed the appeal without examining the merits. The operative legal principle was that where the controlling question has been settled by an earlier judgment of the same Court, the later appeal cannot be maintained on that issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126816</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>