<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (3) TMI 709 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126812</link>
    <description>Homogenisation of cement at the Mangalore unit did not amount to manufacture because the process did not produce a commercially distinct new commodity. The court applied the settled test that manufacture requires transformation of the original commodity into a new commercial product; mere processing, improvement in quality, or increased marketability is insufficient. Cement was brought from Gujarat and only homogenised and packed at Mangalore, so the activity remained ancillary to finished cement rather than a manufacturing process. The claimed sales tax exemption under the industrial incentive notification was therefore not available.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2013 13:13:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=163701" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (3) TMI 709 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126812</link>
      <description>Homogenisation of cement at the Mangalore unit did not amount to manufacture because the process did not produce a commercially distinct new commodity. The court applied the settled test that manufacture requires transformation of the original commodity into a new commercial product; mere processing, improvement in quality, or increased marketability is insufficient. Cement was brought from Gujarat and only homogenised and packed at Mangalore, so the activity remained ancillary to finished cement rather than a manufacturing process. The claimed sales tax exemption under the industrial incentive notification was therefore not available.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126812</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>