<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (10) TMI 564 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126805</link>
    <description>A CBEC circular was held binding on the Department, and the dispute was found to be squarely covered by Circular No. 563/59/2000-CX dated 21 December 2000. As no separate basis for interference with the impugned decision was recorded, the appeal was dismissed. The stated principle is that where a dispute falls squarely within a binding circular issued by the Central Board of Excise and Customs, the appeal is not liable to succeed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Aug 2013 11:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=163694" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (10) TMI 564 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126805</link>
      <description>A CBEC circular was held binding on the Department, and the dispute was found to be squarely covered by Circular No. 563/59/2000-CX dated 21 December 2000. As no separate basis for interference with the impugned decision was recorded, the appeal was dismissed. The stated principle is that where a dispute falls squarely within a binding circular issued by the Central Board of Excise and Customs, the appeal is not liable to succeed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126805</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>