<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1958 (10) TMI 29 - Bombay High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126799</link>
    <description>A remand order must be construed as a whole and in context: where the appellate tribunal intended only to reopen the assessee&#039;s claim for relief from super-tax under section 25(4) of the Income-tax Act, 1922, the lower authority could not expand the enquiry to the entire appeal. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner therefore lacked jurisdiction to travel beyond the limited mandate and reopen matters already concluded. The remand was confined to the super-tax issue, and the reference was answered in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 1958 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 15:16:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=163688" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1958 (10) TMI 29 - Bombay High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126799</link>
      <description>A remand order must be construed as a whole and in context: where the appellate tribunal intended only to reopen the assessee&#039;s claim for relief from super-tax under section 25(4) of the Income-tax Act, 1922, the lower authority could not expand the enquiry to the entire appeal. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner therefore lacked jurisdiction to travel beyond the limited mandate and reopen matters already concluded. The remand was confined to the super-tax issue, and the reference was answered in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 1958 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126799</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>