https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126787 The article notes that both questions raised in the appeal were treated as covered by binding Bombay High Court precedents: the first by CIT v. M/s. Nicholas Piramal India Ltd. and the second by CIT v. M/s. WMI Cranes. On that basis, the Court found that no fresh substantial question of law arose on either point and dismissed the appeal in limine. No order as to costs was made. en-us Fri, 16 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 20 Jan 2013 21:15:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126787 The article notes that both questions raised in the appeal were treated as covered by binding Bombay High Court precedents: the first by CIT v. M/s. Nicholas Piramal India Ltd. and the second by CIT v. M/s. WMI Cranes. On that basis, the Court found that no fresh substantial question of law arose on either point and dismissed the appeal in limine. No order as to costs was made. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 16 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126787