<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1959 (11) TMI 40 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126783</link>
    <description>Sales of stock held at Madras through the assessee&#039;s agent were treated as sales within Madras, making the assessee the dealer for those turnovers. For the imported milk powder, the goods formed part of an unascertained mass, delivery orders were issued after contract, and title did not pass through shipping documents; appropriation to each buyer occurred only on delivery after customs clearance. As the goods were not specific goods under the Sale of Goods Act, the contract did not take the sale outside the State merely because it preceded delivery. The transaction was completed only after import was over and within the State, so both items were taxable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 1959 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2013 18:05:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=163672" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1959 (11) TMI 40 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126783</link>
      <description>Sales of stock held at Madras through the assessee&#039;s agent were treated as sales within Madras, making the assessee the dealer for those turnovers. For the imported milk powder, the goods formed part of an unascertained mass, delivery orders were issued after contract, and title did not pass through shipping documents; appropriation to each buyer occurred only on delivery after customs clearance. As the goods were not specific goods under the Sale of Goods Act, the contract did not take the sale outside the State merely because it preceded delivery. The transaction was completed only after import was over and within the State, so both items were taxable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 1959 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126783</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>