<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (8) TMI 238 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126770</link>
    <description>A transfer of documents of title during movement from one State to another constitutes an inter-State sale under the Central Sales Tax Act, and the first turnover item was exempt as a subsequent sale to a registered dealer. A postal intimation of arrival of imported goods is not a document of title, so endorsement after the goods reached destination did not make the transaction a sale in the course of import; the second turnover item remained taxable as an intra-State sale. Transfer of a bill of lading after the import licence had expired also did not qualify as a sale in the course of import, because later licence extension did not retrospectively validate the transfer; the third turnover item was taxable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2013 10:50:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=163659" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (8) TMI 238 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126770</link>
      <description>A transfer of documents of title during movement from one State to another constitutes an inter-State sale under the Central Sales Tax Act, and the first turnover item was exempt as a subsequent sale to a registered dealer. A postal intimation of arrival of imported goods is not a document of title, so endorsement after the goods reached destination did not make the transaction a sale in the course of import; the second turnover item remained taxable as an intra-State sale. Transfer of a bill of lading after the import licence had expired also did not qualify as a sale in the course of import, because later licence extension did not retrospectively validate the transfer; the third turnover item was taxable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126770</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>