<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (2) TMI 320 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126764</link>
    <description>The Sales Tax Tribunal determined that the sale of the printing machine did not qualify as a sale in the course of import, subjecting it to sales tax. The lack of privity between the foreign exporter and the Indian importer during the final sale transaction post-importation led to this conclusion. Two distinct sales were identified: one between the German manufacturer and the dealer, and the other between the dealer and the purchasing party. The Court upheld the inclusion of the amount in the dealer&#039;s turnover for sales tax purposes, ruling against the dealer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 17:06:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=163653" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (2) TMI 320 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126764</link>
      <description>The Sales Tax Tribunal determined that the sale of the printing machine did not qualify as a sale in the course of import, subjecting it to sales tax. The lack of privity between the foreign exporter and the Indian importer during the final sale transaction post-importation led to this conclusion. Two distinct sales were identified: one between the German manufacturer and the dealer, and the other between the dealer and the purchasing party. The Court upheld the inclusion of the amount in the dealer&#039;s turnover for sales tax purposes, ruling against the dealer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126764</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>