https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126755 Preventive detention requires the detaining authority to apply its own mind when formulating the detention order and grounds, not merely when approving the sponsoring proposal. Where the detention grounds are substantially a verbatim reproduction of the sponsoring authority's material, with only minor word changes, the exercise reflects no independent formulation of subjective satisfaction and breaches Article 22 safeguards. On those facts, the detention order was held vitiated by non-application of mind and was quashed. en-us Fri, 07 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 26 Jul 2018 18:36:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126755 Preventive detention requires the detaining authority to apply its own mind when formulating the detention order and grounds, not merely when approving the sponsoring proposal. Where the detention grounds are substantially a verbatim reproduction of the sponsoring authority's material, with only minor word changes, the exercise reflects no independent formulation of subjective satisfaction and breaches Article 22 safeguards. On those facts, the detention order was held vitiated by non-application of mind and was quashed. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 07 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126755