https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126747 The court ruled that the drowning of workmen while crossing a creek to reach the employer's premises did not occur in the course of employment, absolving the appellant of liability for compensation. Despite the initial compensation award, the appeal was allowed, and the appellant was directed to pay the respondents' costs. The lack of a formal arrangement for ferrying workmen and the absence of a special employment-related agreement were key factors in the decision to overturn the compensation order. Each party was responsible for its own costs related to the proceedings on remand. en-us Mon, 28 Apr 1958 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 27 Dec 2012 15:53:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126747 The court ruled that the drowning of workmen while crossing a creek to reach the employer's premises did not occur in the course of employment, absolving the appellant of liability for compensation. Despite the initial compensation award, the appeal was allowed, and the appellant was directed to pay the respondents' costs. The lack of a formal arrangement for ferrying workmen and the absence of a special employment-related agreement were key factors in the decision to overturn the compensation order. Each party was responsible for its own costs related to the proceedings on remand. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 28 Apr 1958 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126747