https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126742 Section 1(3) of the Employees' State Insurance Act was upheld as valid because the statute set out a complete welfare policy and scheme, leaving only the timing and territorial extension of its operation to the Government. That arrangement was treated as conditional legislation, not excessive delegation, and sufficient legislative guidance was found. Challenges to notices and circulars altering medical benefits were not entertained in writ jurisdiction because the dispute concerned service conditions and benefits that should be pursued through the statutory industrial dispute machinery and the remedies under the Employees' State Insurance Act. The statutory scheme was therefore upheld and the appeals were dismissed. en-us Wed, 26 Feb 1964 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 27 Dec 2012 13:44:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126742 Section 1(3) of the Employees' State Insurance Act was upheld as valid because the statute set out a complete welfare policy and scheme, leaving only the timing and territorial extension of its operation to the Government. That arrangement was treated as conditional legislation, not excessive delegation, and sufficient legislative guidance was found. Challenges to notices and circulars altering medical benefits were not entertained in writ jurisdiction because the dispute concerned service conditions and benefits that should be pursued through the statutory industrial dispute machinery and the remedies under the Employees' State Insurance Act. The statutory scheme was therefore upheld and the appeals were dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 26 Feb 1964 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126742