https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126738 The Tribunal stated that an order disposing of appeals will not be set aside unless sufficient cause is proved for counsel's non-appearance; a bare assertion of illness and lack of hearing notice was insufficient where the record showed prior adjournment in counsel's presence and no affidavit or medical certificate was produced. It also held that a fresh advocate cannot appear for the same party while an earlier vakalat subsists unless the prior authority is determined with leave or the required consent or no objection is obtained. The applications to restore the appeals therefore failed on merits, and the procedural requirement governing counsel's appearance was reaffirmed. en-us Wed, 24 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 24 Dec 2012 18:20:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126738 The Tribunal stated that an order disposing of appeals will not be set aside unless sufficient cause is proved for counsel's non-appearance; a bare assertion of illness and lack of hearing notice was insufficient where the record showed prior adjournment in counsel's presence and no affidavit or medical certificate was produced. It also held that a fresh advocate cannot appear for the same party while an earlier vakalat subsists unless the prior authority is determined with leave or the required consent or no objection is obtained. The applications to restore the appeals therefore failed on merits, and the procedural requirement governing counsel's appearance was reaffirmed. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 24 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126738