<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (4) TMI 457 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126734</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision allowing the assessee to deduct amounts set aside for warranty claims, rejecting the Assessing Officer&#039;s view of them as contingent liabilities. The Court affirmed that liabilities from warranties are deductible under the mercantile accounting system, based on commercial practices and past claims. The appeal was dismissed, confirming no substantial legal question existed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 10:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=163624" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (4) TMI 457 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126734</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision allowing the assessee to deduct amounts set aside for warranty claims, rejecting the Assessing Officer&#039;s view of them as contingent liabilities. The Court affirmed that liabilities from warranties are deductible under the mercantile accounting system, based on commercial practices and past claims. The appeal was dismissed, confirming no substantial legal question existed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126734</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>