https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126733 In public interest litigation concerning children of prostitutes, relief was confined to juvenile homes and rehabilitation under the Juvenile Justice Act, while broader directions on eradication of prostitution were declined because that issue was not squarely pleaded, adequate notice had not been given to affected Governments, and the parties had not been properly heard. The opinion notes that prostitution is constitutionally and statutorily prohibited and that the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 provides the relevant framework, but emphasises that even where a social evil is involved, a court should not issue far-reaching directions beyond the pleadings and hearing before it. en-us Wed, 09 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 20 Jan 2013 20:53:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126733 In public interest litigation concerning children of prostitutes, relief was confined to juvenile homes and rehabilitation under the Juvenile Justice Act, while broader directions on eradication of prostitution were declined because that issue was not squarely pleaded, adequate notice had not been given to affected Governments, and the parties had not been properly heard. The opinion notes that prostitution is constitutionally and statutorily prohibited and that the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 provides the relevant framework, but emphasises that even where a social evil is involved, a court should not issue far-reaching directions beyond the pleadings and hearing before it. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 09 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126733