<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (4) TMI 447 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126730</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part, ruling that security deposits were not taxable trading receipts. The assessee was granted 100% depreciation on gas cylinders, and depreciation on fixed assets was to be based on the actual cost paid per the takeover agreement. The disallowance of traveling expenses was not challenged. The decision was supported by an examination of contractual terms, case law, and statutory provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 12:28:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=163620" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (4) TMI 447 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126730</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part, ruling that security deposits were not taxable trading receipts. The assessee was granted 100% depreciation on gas cylinders, and depreciation on fixed assets was to be based on the actual cost paid per the takeover agreement. The disallowance of traveling expenses was not challenged. The decision was supported by an examination of contractual terms, case law, and statutory provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126730</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>