https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126721 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, CHENNAI ruled in the case involving the classification of the product 'abda' as a plant vitalizer or fertilizer manufactured by M/s. EID Parry (India) Ltd. The Tribunal found the demand for duty, interest, and penalty under Section 11A unsustainable as it was based on the Fertilizer Control Order without notifying the appellants. Acknowledging the plea of limitation, the Tribunal granted a complete waiver of pre-deposit and stayed the recovery of dues pending appeal, emphasizing the importance of proper notification and compliance with procedural requirements. en-us Mon, 29 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 04 Dec 2012 18:49:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126721 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, CHENNAI ruled in the case involving the classification of the product 'abda' as a plant vitalizer or fertilizer manufactured by M/s. EID Parry (India) Ltd. The Tribunal found the demand for duty, interest, and penalty under Section 11A unsustainable as it was based on the Fertilizer Control Order without notifying the appellants. Acknowledging the plea of limitation, the Tribunal granted a complete waiver of pre-deposit and stayed the recovery of dues pending appeal, emphasizing the importance of proper notification and compliance with procedural requirements. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 29 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126721