https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126704 The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) order granting SSI exemption benefit and setting aside the demand for clandestine removal of goods along with the penalty. The Tribunal emphasized that even in cases of alleged clandestine removal, if the SSI exemption criteria are met, the benefit must be allowed. The decision was based on specific dealer confirmations and relevant case laws, supported by a Punjab and Haryana High Court judgment. The Tribunal found no legal infirmity in the order and rejected the appeal, dismissing cross-objections as comments to the Revenue's appeal. en-us Mon, 15 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 04 Dec 2012 17:33:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126704 The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) order granting SSI exemption benefit and setting aside the demand for clandestine removal of goods along with the penalty. The Tribunal emphasized that even in cases of alleged clandestine removal, if the SSI exemption criteria are met, the benefit must be allowed. The decision was based on specific dealer confirmations and relevant case laws, supported by a Punjab and Haryana High Court judgment. The Tribunal found no legal infirmity in the order and rejected the appeal, dismissing cross-objections as comments to the Revenue's appeal. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 15 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126704