<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (6) TMI 843 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126700</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the adjudication order due to lack of personal hearing, emphasizing natural justice. The demand of duty was based on claimed deductions, leading to a substantial pre-deposit requirement contested by the appellants. Significant delay in assessment finalization was noted. Despite appellants admitting dues, the Tribunal focused on merit and natural justice, remanding the matter to the Commissioner (Appeals) without pre-deposit, allowing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2012 17:17:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=163591" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (6) TMI 843 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126700</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the adjudication order due to lack of personal hearing, emphasizing natural justice. The demand of duty was based on claimed deductions, leading to a substantial pre-deposit requirement contested by the appellants. Significant delay in assessment finalization was noted. Despite appellants admitting dues, the Tribunal focused on merit and natural justice, remanding the matter to the Commissioner (Appeals) without pre-deposit, allowing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126700</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>