<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (6) TMI 840 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126697</link>
    <description>The Tribunal modified the orders in a dispute over the valuation of imported second-hand photocopiers, reducing the fine imposed by the Commissioner (Appeals) from 35% to 10% redemption fine and 5% penalty. The Tribunal found the Commissioner&#039;s decision inconsistent with established legal precedents and beyond the scope of the initial order, citing habitual offenses by the appellants. The appeals were disposed of accordingly, providing consequential relief if applicable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2017 11:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=163588" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (6) TMI 840 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126697</link>
      <description>The Tribunal modified the orders in a dispute over the valuation of imported second-hand photocopiers, reducing the fine imposed by the Commissioner (Appeals) from 35% to 10% redemption fine and 5% penalty. The Tribunal found the Commissioner&#039;s decision inconsistent with established legal precedents and beyond the scope of the initial order, citing habitual offenses by the appellants. The appeals were disposed of accordingly, providing consequential relief if applicable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126697</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>