https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126694 Repeated non-compliance with pre-deposit directions can justify dismissal of an appeal where the appellant has been given adequate opportunity but still fails to deposit the required amount or furnish the directed bank guarantee. The text emphasises that the right of appeal is conditional on compliance with statutory pre-deposit requirements and that the Tribunal may refuse further indulgence when continued default would prejudice the Revenue and amount to abuse of process. The stated result is dismissal of the appeals for failure to comply with the Tribunal's directions and for conduct adverse to the Revenue. en-us Tue, 09 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 04 Dec 2012 16:54:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126694 Repeated non-compliance with pre-deposit directions can justify dismissal of an appeal where the appellant has been given adequate opportunity but still fails to deposit the required amount or furnish the directed bank guarantee. The text emphasises that the right of appeal is conditional on compliance with statutory pre-deposit requirements and that the Tribunal may refuse further indulgence when continued default would prejudice the Revenue and amount to abuse of process. The stated result is dismissal of the appeals for failure to comply with the Tribunal's directions and for conduct adverse to the Revenue. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 09 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126694