<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (6) TMI 830 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126686</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of goods seized from the speed post center under Sections 111(d), (l), and (m) of the Customs Act, finding them imported contrary to prohibitions. Penalties under Sections 112(a) and (b) were upheld for some individuals involved in illicit importation, while one penalty was set aside due to lack of evidence. The Tribunal validated the seizure, emphasizing the absence of a customs declaration. Various individuals were held liable, with penalties imposed accordingly. The Tribunal reversed the dropping of penal proceedings against Shri Vishnu Kumar, imposing a penalty and dismissing appeals of other parties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2012 16:13:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=163578" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (6) TMI 830 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126686</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of goods seized from the speed post center under Sections 111(d), (l), and (m) of the Customs Act, finding them imported contrary to prohibitions. Penalties under Sections 112(a) and (b) were upheld for some individuals involved in illicit importation, while one penalty was set aside due to lack of evidence. The Tribunal validated the seizure, emphasizing the absence of a customs declaration. Various individuals were held liable, with penalties imposed accordingly. The Tribunal reversed the dropping of penal proceedings against Shri Vishnu Kumar, imposing a penalty and dismissing appeals of other parties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126686</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>