https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126665 The CESTAT rejected the Revenue's appeal, affirming the Commissioner (A)'s decision to reduce the redemption fine and penalty based on the supplier's letter indicating the misloading of RBD Palmolein. CESTAT emphasized the importance of considering all evidence and upheld the decision due to the lack of contradictory evidence from the Revenue. The case highlighted the significance of substantial proof in challenging customs findings, ultimately confirming the legality and correctness of the Commissioner (A)'s order. en-us Tue, 26 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 04 Dec 2012 14:39:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126665 The CESTAT rejected the Revenue's appeal, affirming the Commissioner (A)'s decision to reduce the redemption fine and penalty based on the supplier's letter indicating the misloading of RBD Palmolein. CESTAT emphasized the importance of considering all evidence and upheld the decision due to the lack of contradictory evidence from the Revenue. The case highlighted the significance of substantial proof in challenging customs findings, ultimately confirming the legality and correctness of the Commissioner (A)'s order. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 26 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126665