<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (5) TMI 782 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126657</link>
    <description>Waiver of pre-deposit was granted for the balance duty and penalty demand because the dispute concerned alleged non-fulfilment of export obligations and non-use of imported consumables. The amount already encashed by the Revenue was treated as sufficient security for the disputed dues at the interim stage, so no further coercive recovery was considered necessary pending disposal of the appeal. Coercive recovery of the balance demand was therefore stayed until the appeal is decided.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2012 13:58:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=163549" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (5) TMI 782 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126657</link>
      <description>Waiver of pre-deposit was granted for the balance duty and penalty demand because the dispute concerned alleged non-fulfilment of export obligations and non-use of imported consumables. The amount already encashed by the Revenue was treated as sufficient security for the disputed dues at the interim stage, so no further coercive recovery was considered necessary pending disposal of the appeal. Coercive recovery of the balance demand was therefore stayed until the appeal is decided.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126657</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>