https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126652 CENVAT credit was treated as admissible where the imported goods were received and used in manufacture without dispute, even though the credit was taken beyond six months from the Bills of Entry and on photocopies rather than originals. The Tribunal noted that Rule 57G(5) was invoked to allege time-bar, but an earlier precedent had allowed credit when loss of the original Bill of Entry was intimated in time and a certificate was sought, and the Revenue showed no overruling or stay of that precedent. The credit was therefore sustained and the Revenue's challenge failed. en-us Fri, 15 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 04 Dec 2012 13:43:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126652 CENVAT credit was treated as admissible where the imported goods were received and used in manufacture without dispute, even though the credit was taken beyond six months from the Bills of Entry and on photocopies rather than originals. The Tribunal noted that Rule 57G(5) was invoked to allege time-bar, but an earlier precedent had allowed credit when loss of the original Bill of Entry was intimated in time and a certificate was sought, and the Revenue showed no overruling or stay of that precedent. The credit was therefore sustained and the Revenue's challenge failed. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 15 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126652