<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (5) TMI 768 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126643</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Kolkata due to procedural irregularities in the authorization and verification processes of filing the appeal. The lack of proper authorization and verification as per procedural rules rendered the appeal not maintainable, leading to its dismissal. The judgment emphasized the importance of strict adherence to procedural rules in legal proceedings and highlighted the significance of proper documentation and verification in legal actions before the tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2012 12:25:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=163535" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (5) TMI 768 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126643</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Kolkata due to procedural irregularities in the authorization and verification processes of filing the appeal. The lack of proper authorization and verification as per procedural rules rendered the appeal not maintainable, leading to its dismissal. The judgment emphasized the importance of strict adherence to procedural rules in legal proceedings and highlighted the significance of proper documentation and verification in legal actions before the tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126643</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>