<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (4) TMI 759 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126636</link>
    <description>The Tribunal classified ENO Fruit Salt as a &quot;P or P Ayurvedic Medicament&quot; under sub-heading 3003.39/3004.90 11, setting aside duty demands and penalties imposed by revenue authorities. The decision was based on product labeling, drug licenses, and expert opinions supporting the Ayurvedic classification. The Tribunal emphasized the significance of these factors in determining the classification of Ayurvedic medicaments, leading to a favorable outcome for the appellants with consequential relief granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2012 11:46:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=163528" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (4) TMI 759 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126636</link>
      <description>The Tribunal classified ENO Fruit Salt as a &quot;P or P Ayurvedic Medicament&quot; under sub-heading 3003.39/3004.90 11, setting aside duty demands and penalties imposed by revenue authorities. The decision was based on product labeling, drug licenses, and expert opinions supporting the Ayurvedic classification. The Tribunal emphasized the significance of these factors in determining the classification of Ayurvedic medicaments, leading to a favorable outcome for the appellants with consequential relief granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126636</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>