https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126630 Pre-execution interference with a COFEPOSA detention order is confined to narrow jurisdictional defects, such as lack of authority, wrong person, wrong purpose, or vague and irrelevant grounds; the challenge on the grounds urged was therefore not maintainable. Delay did not invalidate the order because the interval was explained by continuing investigation, processing, translations, and further material, with no snapping of the live link shown. Alleged non-placement of vital documents was not established, as the record showed consideration of relevant material and the pre-execution objection remained conjectural. The repeal of FERA and enactment of FEMA did not bar preventive detention under COFEPOSA where the alleged conduct affected foreign exchange conservation or augmentation. en-us Thu, 18 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 26 Nov 2012 11:31:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126630 Pre-execution interference with a COFEPOSA detention order is confined to narrow jurisdictional defects, such as lack of authority, wrong person, wrong purpose, or vague and irrelevant grounds; the challenge on the grounds urged was therefore not maintainable. Delay did not invalidate the order because the interval was explained by continuing investigation, processing, translations, and further material, with no snapping of the live link shown. Alleged non-placement of vital documents was not established, as the record showed consideration of relevant material and the pre-execution objection remained conjectural. The repeal of FERA and enactment of FEMA did not bar preventive detention under COFEPOSA where the alleged conduct affected foreign exchange conservation or augmentation. Case-Laws FEMA Thu, 18 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126630