<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (5) TMI 764 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126629</link>
    <description>On repeal with saving, accrued rights, pending remedies and liabilities under the earlier foreign exchange law survived, unless the later statute showed a contrary intention. The vested right of appeal in matters arising under the repealed law was preserved, although the appellate forum was substituted. Section 24 of the General Clauses Act also continued subordinate legislation made under the repealed law so far as it was not inconsistent with the re-enacted statute. As a result, appeals from adjudication orders under the repealed enactment remained subject to the earlier appeal-fee regime, and the higher fee under the new rules applied only to appeals under the later enactment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2013 15:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=163521" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (5) TMI 764 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126629</link>
      <description>On repeal with saving, accrued rights, pending remedies and liabilities under the earlier foreign exchange law survived, unless the later statute showed a contrary intention. The vested right of appeal in matters arising under the repealed law was preserved, although the appellate forum was substituted. Section 24 of the General Clauses Act also continued subordinate legislation made under the repealed law so far as it was not inconsistent with the re-enacted statute. As a result, appeals from adjudication orders under the repealed enactment remained subject to the earlier appeal-fee regime, and the higher fee under the new rules applied only to appeals under the later enactment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126629</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>