<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 907 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126628</link>
    <description>Delay was condoned, but the special petition was dismissed because the special leave petitions against the judgments relied upon had already been dismissed. The Court treated those earlier dismissals as determinative of the controversy and therefore found no basis to entertain the present petition. No merits adjudication followed, as the prior dismissal of the relied-upon SLPs rendered the present challenge ineffective.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2015 15:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=163520" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 907 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126628</link>
      <description>Delay was condoned, but the special petition was dismissed because the special leave petitions against the judgments relied upon had already been dismissed. The Court treated those earlier dismissals as determinative of the controversy and therefore found no basis to entertain the present petition. No merits adjudication followed, as the prior dismissal of the relied-upon SLPs rendered the present challenge ineffective.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126628</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>