https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126627 Tamil translations of a preventive detention order were found sufficient because Article 22(5) requires a true free translation conveying the substance, not a literal word-for-word version; the challenge for defective translation failed. The alleged delay in disposing of the detenu's representation was also treated as explained, since part of the delay resulted from the detenu's own request and the later period was satisfactorily accounted for. However, the repeal of FERA and its replacement by FEMA materially altered the foreign exchange law regime, and the Court held that the preventive detention basis under COFEPOSA could not survive that legal change. The detention order was therefore unsustainable. en-us Thu, 02 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 24 Nov 2012 13:35:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126627 Tamil translations of a preventive detention order were found sufficient because Article 22(5) requires a true free translation conveying the substance, not a literal word-for-word version; the challenge for defective translation failed. The alleged delay in disposing of the detenu's representation was also treated as explained, since part of the delay resulted from the detenu's own request and the later period was satisfactorily accounted for. However, the repeal of FERA and its replacement by FEMA materially altered the foreign exchange law regime, and the Court held that the preventive detention basis under COFEPOSA could not survive that legal change. The detention order was therefore unsustainable. Case-Laws FEMA Thu, 02 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126627