https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126624 Review jurisdiction remains narrow and cannot be used to reargue the case on the same record or to challenge findings on merits. A new counsel who did not appear in the original writ hearing cannot ordinarily reopen the matter in review, except where a patent error apparent on the face of the record is shown. Dismissal of a special leave petition before grant of leave does not by itself bar review or cause merger of the High Court judgment, but review is still confined to new matter, mistake, or analogous sufficient cause. Reappraisal of evidence and pleadings falls outside review, and the request for further time to vacate the premises also failed. en-us Tue, 22 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 24 Nov 2012 10:40:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126624 Review jurisdiction remains narrow and cannot be used to reargue the case on the same record or to challenge findings on merits. A new counsel who did not appear in the original writ hearing cannot ordinarily reopen the matter in review, except where a patent error apparent on the face of the record is shown. Dismissal of a special leave petition before grant of leave does not by itself bar review or cause merger of the High Court judgment, but review is still confined to new matter, mistake, or analogous sufficient cause. Reappraisal of evidence and pleadings falls outside review, and the request for further time to vacate the premises also failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 22 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126624