<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (9) TMI 905 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126621</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the ld. CIT(A) that profit from future and option transactions should be treated as speculative until the relevant amendment, not applicable retrospectively. The Special Bench judgment was considered binding, and no contrary material or higher court judgment was presented to warrant a different view. Therefore, the appeal filed by the assessee was dismissed, clarifying the distinction between speculative and business transactions in such cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2012 16:19:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=163513" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (9) TMI 905 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126621</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the ld. CIT(A) that profit from future and option transactions should be treated as speculative until the relevant amendment, not applicable retrospectively. The Special Bench judgment was considered binding, and no contrary material or higher court judgment was presented to warrant a different view. Therefore, the appeal filed by the assessee was dismissed, clarifying the distinction between speculative and business transactions in such cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126621</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>