<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (4) TMI 748 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126609</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the stay application and appeal filed by the Revenue, upholding the Commissioner (Appeals) decision to allow the refund of interest paid by the respondents. The Tribunal relied on the legal precedent set by the High Court and upheld by the Apex Court, determining that the assessee was not liable to pay interest as the credit was not utilized but merely entered in the Modvat account.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2012 15:20:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=163501" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (4) TMI 748 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126609</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the stay application and appeal filed by the Revenue, upholding the Commissioner (Appeals) decision to allow the refund of interest paid by the respondents. The Tribunal relied on the legal precedent set by the High Court and upheld by the Apex Court, determining that the assessee was not liable to pay interest as the credit was not utilized but merely entered in the Modvat account.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126609</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>