<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (3) TMI 856 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126599</link>
    <description>The impugned orders remanding the matters were set aside, and the issue was remanded back to the Commissioner (Appeals) to reconsider and pass an appropriate order after granting an opportunity of hearing to the appellants, in line with the amended Section 128A and previous Bench decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2012 14:41:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=163491" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (3) TMI 856 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126599</link>
      <description>The impugned orders remanding the matters were set aside, and the issue was remanded back to the Commissioner (Appeals) to reconsider and pass an appropriate order after granting an opportunity of hearing to the appellants, in line with the amended Section 128A and previous Bench decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126599</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>