<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (3) TMI 852 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126595</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding the inclusion of freight and transportation charges for returning empty cylinders in the assessable value of excisable goods. Citing precedent, the Tribunal found that such charges should not be included unless directly linked to manufacturing activities or the final product. The decision highlights the necessity of establishing a clear connection between additional charges and the manufacturing process to justify their inclusion in the assessable value for excise duty purposes. The judgment underscores the importance of consistent interpretation and application of relevant legal principles in resolving excise duty disputes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2012 14:19:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=163488" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (3) TMI 852 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126595</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding the inclusion of freight and transportation charges for returning empty cylinders in the assessable value of excisable goods. Citing precedent, the Tribunal found that such charges should not be included unless directly linked to manufacturing activities or the final product. The decision highlights the necessity of establishing a clear connection between additional charges and the manufacturing process to justify their inclusion in the assessable value for excise duty purposes. The judgment underscores the importance of consistent interpretation and application of relevant legal principles in resolving excise duty disputes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126595</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>