<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (2) TMI 682 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126580</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the Commissioner for de novo adjudication due to the denial of natural justice, directing the provision of essential documents to the appellants and ensuring a fair hearing within a specified deadline. The duty demand and penalties imposed on the appellant firm and its partners were set aside for further review in light of alleged irregularities in availing Cenvat credit and clearances of goods without payment of duty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2012 13:00:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=163473" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (2) TMI 682 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126580</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the Commissioner for de novo adjudication due to the denial of natural justice, directing the provision of essential documents to the appellants and ensuring a fair hearing within a specified deadline. The duty demand and penalties imposed on the appellant firm and its partners were set aside for further review in light of alleged irregularities in availing Cenvat credit and clearances of goods without payment of duty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126580</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>