<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (1) TMI 730 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126577</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found no mutuality of interest between KPPL and NPL, ruling that the transactions were on a principal-to-principal basis. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the demand of differential duty on KPPL and nullified the penalties imposed on NPL. The issue of limitation was not addressed as the appeals were allowed on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2012 12:51:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=163470" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (1) TMI 730 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126577</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found no mutuality of interest between KPPL and NPL, ruling that the transactions were on a principal-to-principal basis. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the demand of differential duty on KPPL and nullified the penalties imposed on NPL. The issue of limitation was not addressed as the appeals were allowed on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126577</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>