<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (1) TMI 729 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126576</link>
    <description>The High Court remanded stay petitions for fresh orders on the waiver application due to inadequate consideration of the hardship factor by the Tribunal. The Court directed the Tribunal to provide reasons for their decision within a specified timeframe and ordered no recovery until a new decision was made. Despite the appellant&#039;s claim of financial hardship, the Tribunal held a prima facie view against them for waiver of dues based on findings, directing the appellant to deposit an additional sum within a specified period. Upon compliance, the Tribunal waived the pre-deposit of the balance amount of duty and penalties, staying the recovery pending appeal disposal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2012 12:46:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=163469" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (1) TMI 729 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126576</link>
      <description>The High Court remanded stay petitions for fresh orders on the waiver application due to inadequate consideration of the hardship factor by the Tribunal. The Court directed the Tribunal to provide reasons for their decision within a specified timeframe and ordered no recovery until a new decision was made. Despite the appellant&#039;s claim of financial hardship, the Tribunal held a prima facie view against them for waiver of dues based on findings, directing the appellant to deposit an additional sum within a specified period. Upon compliance, the Tribunal waived the pre-deposit of the balance amount of duty and penalties, staying the recovery pending appeal disposal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126576</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>