<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (1) TMI 727 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126574</link>
    <description>The High Court held that interest under Section 11AA of the Central Excise Act was not payable on unutilized credits, overturning the Commissioner (Appeals) decision. The Court found the appellants&#039; argument valid, citing relevant case law, and remanded the matter for a fresh decision considering the cited precedents. The appellants were given the chance to present their case again before a final ruling was made.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2012 12:39:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=163467" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (1) TMI 727 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126574</link>
      <description>The High Court held that interest under Section 11AA of the Central Excise Act was not payable on unutilized credits, overturning the Commissioner (Appeals) decision. The Court found the appellants&#039; argument valid, citing relevant case law, and remanded the matter for a fresh decision considering the cited precedents. The appellants were given the chance to present their case again before a final ruling was made.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126574</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>