<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (1) TMI 722 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126569</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the Commissioner (A)&#039;s decision to allow Cenvat credit on items like Aluminum Sheets, Gaskets, and Electrodes used in repair &amp;amp; maintenance activities, in accordance with the High Court of Rajasthan&#039;s ruling. The Tribunal found that the items were eligible for credit as per established legal precedent, despite the revenue&#039;s arguments to the contrary.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2012 12:23:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=163462" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (1) TMI 722 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126569</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the Commissioner (A)&#039;s decision to allow Cenvat credit on items like Aluminum Sheets, Gaskets, and Electrodes used in repair &amp;amp; maintenance activities, in accordance with the High Court of Rajasthan&#039;s ruling. The Tribunal found that the items were eligible for credit as per established legal precedent, despite the revenue&#039;s arguments to the contrary.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126569</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>