<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (1) TMI 721 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126568</link>
    <description>Credit on inputs and capital goods lying in a factory is not recoverable merely because the undertaking is transferred on lease, where the goods remain in the factory and continue to be used in or in relation to manufacture of final products. The Tribunal treated the same principle as applicable to transfer of the factory on lease or sale, and rejected recovery of the credit together with consequential demand, interest and penalty on that basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2012 12:22:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=163461" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (1) TMI 721 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126568</link>
      <description>Credit on inputs and capital goods lying in a factory is not recoverable merely because the undertaking is transferred on lease, where the goods remain in the factory and continue to be used in or in relation to manufacture of final products. The Tribunal treated the same principle as applicable to transfer of the factory on lease or sale, and rejected recovery of the credit together with consequential demand, interest and penalty on that basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126568</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>