https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126566 The court recalled the order directing a writ petition to be treated as an appeal under Section 35 of the Foreign Exchange Management Act, citing the lack of a question of law for appeal. It emphasized the binding nature of counsel's concessions and the constitutional validity of High Court jurisdiction under Article 226, highlighting the importance of preserving this power for justice and progressive rights development. The decision restored the writ petition to its original status, ensuring the petitioner's right to challenge the order under Article 226. en-us Mon, 14 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 15 Dec 2014 18:12:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126566 The court recalled the order directing a writ petition to be treated as an appeal under Section 35 of the Foreign Exchange Management Act, citing the lack of a question of law for appeal. It emphasized the binding nature of counsel's concessions and the constitutional validity of High Court jurisdiction under Article 226, highlighting the importance of preserving this power for justice and progressive rights development. The decision restored the writ petition to its original status, ensuring the petitioner's right to challenge the order under Article 226. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 14 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126566