<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (8) TMI 880 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126563</link>
    <description>Coercive detention of goods for recovery under the compounded levy scheme must comply with natural justice even where the statute does not expressly require a show-cause notice. Where the proposed action would divest an assessee of property, an opportunity of hearing is required before detention is sustained. The appellate order was confined to insisting on fair procedure before coercive action, and the record indicated that detention had effectively ceased. The assessee therefore succeeded, and the detention order could not stand without observance of natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2012 11:40:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=163456" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (8) TMI 880 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126563</link>
      <description>Coercive detention of goods for recovery under the compounded levy scheme must comply with natural justice even where the statute does not expressly require a show-cause notice. Where the proposed action would divest an assessee of property, an opportunity of hearing is required before detention is sustained. The appellate order was confined to insisting on fair procedure before coercive action, and the record indicated that detention had effectively ceased. The assessee therefore succeeded, and the detention order could not stand without observance of natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126563</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>