<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (8) TMI 878 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126561</link>
    <description>An unconditional exemption notification supported a strong prima facie case for the appellant, and the tribunal accepted the contention that Rule 19 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 is relevant only where goods are otherwise dutiable. On that basis, pre-deposit of duty and penalty was waived and recovery was stayed unconditionally.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2012 11:31:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=163454" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (8) TMI 878 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126561</link>
      <description>An unconditional exemption notification supported a strong prima facie case for the appellant, and the tribunal accepted the contention that Rule 19 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 is relevant only where goods are otherwise dutiable. On that basis, pre-deposit of duty and penalty was waived and recovery was stayed unconditionally.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126561</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>