<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (7) TMI 989 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126546</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the appellant was entitled to a reasoned and speaking order following a quasi-judicial decision by the authority. As the decision conveyed in an administrative letter lacked a reasoned order, the Tribunal deemed it non-adjudicatory, thus ruling the appeal under Section 129-A of the Customs Act, 1962 as not maintainable. Consequently, the matter was remanded to the competent authority for a fair hearing, emphasizing the importance of timely disposal and ensuring justice for the parties involved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2012 10:24:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=163439" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (7) TMI 989 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126546</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the appellant was entitled to a reasoned and speaking order following a quasi-judicial decision by the authority. As the decision conveyed in an administrative letter lacked a reasoned order, the Tribunal deemed it non-adjudicatory, thus ruling the appeal under Section 129-A of the Customs Act, 1962 as not maintainable. Consequently, the matter was remanded to the competent authority for a fair hearing, emphasizing the importance of timely disposal and ensuring justice for the parties involved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126546</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>