<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (7) TMI 987 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126544</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Ahmedabad set aside impugned orders confirming demand against processing units and imposing penalties, allowing all four appeals with consequential relief to the appellants. The Tribunal found that the findings of clandestine removal were solely based on a statement without independent evidence, and noted that similar proceedings against other units were dropped due to insufficient evidence. The case originated from unaccounted processed fabrics found during a visit by Central Excise Officers to a folding unit, leading to proceedings against processing houses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2012 10:20:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=163437" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (7) TMI 987 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126544</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Ahmedabad set aside impugned orders confirming demand against processing units and imposing penalties, allowing all four appeals with consequential relief to the appellants. The Tribunal found that the findings of clandestine removal were solely based on a statement without independent evidence, and noted that similar proceedings against other units were dropped due to insufficient evidence. The case originated from unaccounted processed fabrics found during a visit by Central Excise Officers to a folding unit, leading to proceedings against processing houses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126544</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>