<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (7) TMI 958 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126515</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, CHENNAI granted the application for waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalty amounting to Rs. 26,78,241/- and Rs. 5,25,000/- respectively under the Project Imports Regulations, 1986. The central issue was the denial of project import benefit to a single machine, &quot;Extruder ZSK 58 MEGA Compounder with standard accessories,&quot; imported for substantial expansion of an industrial plant. The Tribunal found no provision disallowing project import benefit to a single machine in the regulations and considered the imported machinery&#039;s purpose for expansion. Consequently, the Tribunal granted an unconditional waiver of the pre-deposit of duty and penalty, staying the recovery during the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2012 16:49:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=163408" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (7) TMI 958 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126515</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, CHENNAI granted the application for waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalty amounting to Rs. 26,78,241/- and Rs. 5,25,000/- respectively under the Project Imports Regulations, 1986. The central issue was the denial of project import benefit to a single machine, &quot;Extruder ZSK 58 MEGA Compounder with standard accessories,&quot; imported for substantial expansion of an industrial plant. The Tribunal found no provision disallowing project import benefit to a single machine in the regulations and considered the imported machinery&#039;s purpose for expansion. Consequently, the Tribunal granted an unconditional waiver of the pre-deposit of duty and penalty, staying the recovery during the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126515</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>