https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126499 The Tribunal directed the applicants in Stay Petition No. E/S/1676/08 to pre-deposit the demanded amount within a specified period, failing which their appeal would be dismissed. In Stay Petition No. E/S/323/2009, the Tribunal found the applicants liable to pre-deposit the demanded sum within a specified timeframe due to the doctrine of unjust enrichment, with the penalty pre-deposit being waived upon compliance. The second stay petition was dismissed as infructuous, and the amount was directed to be held by the Department pending appeal disposal. en-us Wed, 24 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 21 Nov 2012 15:27:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126499 The Tribunal directed the applicants in Stay Petition No. E/S/1676/08 to pre-deposit the demanded amount within a specified period, failing which their appeal would be dismissed. In Stay Petition No. E/S/323/2009, the Tribunal found the applicants liable to pre-deposit the demanded sum within a specified timeframe due to the doctrine of unjust enrichment, with the penalty pre-deposit being waived upon compliance. The second stay petition was dismissed as infructuous, and the amount was directed to be held by the Department pending appeal disposal. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 24 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126499