https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126488 The Tribunal rejected the appeal, ruling that the appellants were not entitled to a refund of the duty deposited as the order confirming the duty demand had not been challenged and had attained finality. The appellants' argument that the duty was paid under protest was not accepted, emphasizing the importance of appealing orders to contest them. The Commissioner (Appeals) also supported this decision, citing the finality of unchallenged orders and previous Tribunal decisions. en-us Mon, 22 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 21 Nov 2012 14:29:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126488 The Tribunal rejected the appeal, ruling that the appellants were not entitled to a refund of the duty deposited as the order confirming the duty demand had not been challenged and had attained finality. The appellants' argument that the duty was paid under protest was not accepted, emphasizing the importance of appealing orders to contest them. The Commissioner (Appeals) also supported this decision, citing the finality of unchallenged orders and previous Tribunal decisions. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 22 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126488