<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (6) TMI 1034 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126478</link>
    <description>The Appellants were held liable to pay duty under Section 11D of the Central Excise Act for availing money credit under Notification No. 45/89-C.E. for minor oils used in manufacturing. However, a Board Circular clarified that such demands are not sustainable, as duty collected and deposited with the Government exempts applicability of Section 11D. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the Appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2017 12:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=163371" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (6) TMI 1034 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126478</link>
      <description>The Appellants were held liable to pay duty under Section 11D of the Central Excise Act for availing money credit under Notification No. 45/89-C.E. for minor oils used in manufacturing. However, a Board Circular clarified that such demands are not sustainable, as duty collected and deposited with the Government exempts applicability of Section 11D. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the Appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=126478</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>